A Ghost At The Movies

A photographer in Norwich found what kind of looks like a double exposure on one of a series of photographs he took at a local cinema. Rather than go wild and rashly assume that the picture WAS a double exposure, he decided, as any reasonable person would, that he had inadvertently photographed a ghost.

According to The Advertiser the photographer, Andrew Kitt said, “The hairs on the back of my neck went up when I first saw it. I’m keeping an open mind. I’m not saying it’s a ghost or anything, but it is certainly strange,” said Mr Kitt.

It’s not a hoax, he obviously has no way of explaining how a double exposure could have occurred, so it must be “strange”. Nobody in the history of spirit photography has been able to explain why an indistinct image or mark on a picture should be assumed to have a supernatural explanation. Oh, wait, it’s probably because there’s so much hard evidence of the existence of ghosts that it’s hard to explain these anomalies any other way.

Here’s a video of a ghost, or something: